The following studies did not specify clearly which version of Framingham scale was used and hence cannot be categorised. References 1. Ferrario M, Chiodini P, Chambless LE, et al. Prediction of coronary events in a low incidence population. Assessing accuracy of the CUORE Cohort Study prediction equation. International Journal of . . . Read more
Background info: RICORNA RICORNA is an adaption of the Framingham-Wilson equation for Navarra, Spain. 1) End-points measured 10 year risk of total coronary heart disease (CHD) Total CHD is defined to include: Angina pectoris Myocardial infarction Coronary death 2) Profile of original population at baseline Navarra, Spain Age: 35 to . . . Read more
Timeline for Framingham risk scales Before reviewing the available validation studies for Framingham risk scales, it is important to have a basic understanding of the timeline for these scales. This is because each Framingham scale is designed to measure a different and specific CVD outcome or is generated using different . . . Read more
Timeline for Framingham risk scales Framingham General Cardiovascular Risk Profile Framingham – Wilson Framingham – Anderson Examples of scales derived from the Framingham Heart Study: Framingham – REGICOR Framingham – ATP (Adult Treatment Panel) III RICORNA
In 2010, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ceased recommending any single risk scale (1) for the assessment of cardiovascular risk in primary prevention due to a lack of evidence that the previously recommended Framingham-Anderson scale was more predictive than other existing scales. This was amended in the 2014 . . . Read more
Integrating risk vs. benefit scales (e.g. primary prevention treatment vs. bleeding risk) As discussed in Structure of this Wiki, risk assessment scales are generated to assist physicians in decision making to implement interventions that will reduce the risk of an identified illness. However, both sides of the balance scale must be . . . Read more
Click on the linked titles opposite to find out more about the literature review and identify references for validation studies pertaining to specific scales. Introduction Project background Aim and Methodology Literature Search Strategy Presentation of data from literature review (year of development) Scales developed by Framingham Heart Study (1991 to 2008) . . . Read more
1) Other primary predictions of cardiovascular diseases (NEW AND OPEN FOR DEVELOPMENT!) Short intro: For predicting risk of developing cardiovascular disease in the general population without having prior diagnosis of the disease Prediction of stroke only (input invited) Prediction of hypertension only (input invited) 2) Preoperative risk assessment (NEW AND OPEN FOR DEVELOPMENT!) . . . Read more
Primary publication: Thompson MJ,Elton RA,Sturgeon KR,Manclark SL,Fraser AK,Walker WS, Cameron EW. The Edinburgh cardiac surgery score survival prediction in the long stay ICU cardiac surgical patient. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1995;9:419-25.
List of scales: The Ontario scoring system – 1995 European system for cardiac operative risk evaluation (euroSCORE II) – 2011 The Parsonnet score – 1989 Cleveland Clinic score – 1992 French score – 1995 Quality Measurement and Management Initiative (QMMI) – 2001 Cardiac Anesthesia Risk Evaluation (CARE) score Edinburgh cardiac surgery score – 1995