Non-specified Framingham studies
The following studies did not specify clearly which version of Framingham scale was used and hence cannot be categorised.
| Author | Year | Ethnicity | Age group | Follow up | Calibration statistic | Discrimination |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Liao (5) | 1999 | US (Framingham, NHANES I & II) | Mean: Framingham (49.6), NHANES I (53.2), II (54.3) | Framingham (24 years), NHANES I (20 years), II (15 years) | NHANES I (0.71 men, 0.80 women), II (0.74 men, 0.76 women) | |
| Thomsen (3) | 2002 | Danish (Glostrup population study) | 49-70 | 10 years | 0.75-0.77 | |
| Liu (2) | 2004 | Chinese | 35-64 | 10 years | 0.705 (men), 0.742 (women) | |
| Zhang (4) | 2005 | Chinese | 18-74 | 13.5 years | ||
| Ferrario (1) | 2005 | Italy (CUORE) | 35-69 | 10 years | 0.723 |
Note:
|
References
1. Ferrario M, Chiodini P, Chambless LE, et al. Prediction of coronary events in a low incidence population. Assessing accuracy of the CUORE Cohort Study prediction equation. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2005;34(2):413-421.
2. Liu J, Hong Y, D’Agostino RB, Sr., et al. Predictive value for the Chinese population of the Framingham CHD risk assessment tool compared with the Chinese Multi-Provincial Cohort Study. JAMA. 2004;291(21):2591-2599.
3. Thomsen TF, McGee D, Davidsen M, Jorgensen T. A cross-validation of risk-scores for coronary heart disease mortality based on data from the Glostrup Population Studies and Framingham Heart Study. International Journal of Epidemiology. 2002;31(4):817-822.
4. Zhang X-F, Attia J, D’Este C, Yu X-H, Wu X-G. A risk score predicted coronary heart disease and stroke in a Chinese cohort. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2005;58(9):951-958.
5. Liao Y, McGee DL, Cooper RS, Sutkowski MBE. How generalizable are coronary risk prediction models? Comparison of Framingham and two national cohorts. American Heart Journal. 1999;137(5):837-845.